Cases 51 - 60 of 66
CAMACHO V. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2010cv35058
Plaintiff:
JOHN CAMACHO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
CAMACHO V. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2010cv35758
Plaintiff:
SALVADOR CAMACHO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
CAMACHO V. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2010cv35925
Plaintiff:
ESTEBAN CAMACHO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
GERARDO v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv32199
Plaintiff:
CAMACHO GERARDO
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
CAMACHO v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv31504
Plaintiff:
RAMON CAMACHO
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAMACHO v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv31505
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. CAMACHO
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Angry v. Camacho
as 1:2009cv00941
Plaintiff:
Terry Duwayne Angry
Defendant:
Martha Camacho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meraz-Camacho v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 3:2008cv02093
Plaintiff:
Moises Meraz-Camacho
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
C. et al v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2007cv04714
Plaintiff:
MARIA C. and IRIS NEREIDA CAMACHO
Defendant:
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
ADDISON et al v. A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv63259
Plaintiff:
BUDDY ADDISON, MARY S. ADDISON, NUBAR P. AKELLIAN and others
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
