Cases 51 - 60 of 103
Smith v. Scientific Drilling International Inc
as 4:2014cv01685
Plaintiff:
Gurney D Smith
Defendant:
Scientific Drilling International Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Smith v. ORBCOMM, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00666
Plaintiff:
Joseph D Smith
Defendant:
ORBCOMM, Inc. and Startrak Information Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Smith v. Honeywell International, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00665
Plaintiff:
Joseph D Smith
Defendant:
Honeywell International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Smith et al v. JLM Direct Funding, Ltd. et al
as 3:2014cv00022
Plaintiff:
Jermaine D. Smith and Danika Smith
Defendant:
JLM Direct Funding, Ltd., U.S. Bank, N.A. as Trustee for Securitized Trust Bear Stearns Asset-Backed Securities I Trust 2006-AC1 , EMC Mortgage Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hilmers v. Khoshdel et al
as 4:2013cv03795
Plaintiff:
Patrick C Hilmers, Jr
Defendant:
Abba Khoshdel, Bobby Vincent, Pamela ` Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wofford v. Morris et al
as 4:2013cv03532
Plaintiff:
Leonard Ray Wofford
Defendant:
R. Morris, R Gunnels, G. Currie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00996
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Smith v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2013cv04105
Plaintiff:
Randy D. Smith
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2013cv02712
Petitioner:
Laderrick D Smith
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv01884
Plaintiff:
Eddie D Smith
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
