Cases 51 - 60 of 156
Terrell v. Williams et al
as 6:2017cv00104
Plaintiff:
Marcus Anthony Terrell
Defendant:
Doug Williams, Thompson, Wicker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guajardo v. Williams
as 1:2017cv02571
Petitioner:
Nelson C. Guajardo
Respondent:
Doug Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mitchell v. Williams et al
as 6:2017cv00087
Plaintiff:
Michael Mitchell
Defendant:
Doug Williams, Bryan Hinton and Mercedes Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subcribing to Policy No. TPLIAB067220 v. LS FL Ranch, LLC et al
as 8:2017cv00800
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subcribing to Policy No. TPLIAB067220
Defendant:
LS FL Ranch, LLC, Linn Curtis Whisman, Doug Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
NOLLEY v. WILLIAMS
as 3:2017cv00054
Petitioner:
DARNELL NOLLEY
Respondent:
DOUG WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crowner v. Williams et al
as 6:2017cv00034
Plaintiff:
Caralis Crowner
Defendant:
Doug Williams, Eric Smokes, Mrs. Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grogan v. Bryson et al
as 6:2017cv00032
Plaintiff:
Tyler Grogan
Defendant:
Homer Bryson, Doug Williams, Tyrone Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adal Grazeta v. Homer Bryson, et al
as 17-10481
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADAL GRAZETA
Defendant - Appellee:
HOMER BRYSON, in their individual and in his official capacity, ROBERT TOOLE, WARDEN in their individual and in their official capacity, DOUG WILLIAMS, in their individual and in their official capacity and others
Johnson v. Williams et al
as 1:2017cv00022
Petitioner:
LYNDON B JOHNSON, JR
Respondent:
DOUG WILLIAMS and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Quintanilla v. Bryson et al
as 6:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
Edgar Quintanilla
Defendant:
Homer Bryson, Robert Toole, Otis Stanton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
