Cases 51 - 60 of 87
Morales v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 1:2008cv00341
Petitioner:
Rafael Calisto Morales
Respondent:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons, D.B. Drew, D Turner and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cook v. Drew et al
as 1:2008cv00144
Petitioner:
Gregory Lejuan Cook
Respondent:
D.B. Drew and B Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Petersen v. Drew (INMATE 3)
as 2:2008cv00040
Plaintiff:
Allan A. Petersen
Defendant:
Darlene A. Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Lappin et al (INMATE3)
as 2:2007cv01117
Plaintiff:
Roy Williams
Defendant:
Harley Lappin and D. Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dumonde v. Cavers et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2007cv01079
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lafitte Dumonde
Defendant:
Kathy Cavers, Darlene Drew, Ricky Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Riley v. Drew et al
as 1:2007cv02128
Petitioner:
Elmer Riley
Respondent:
D.B. Drew, C. Ratledge and Federal Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robinson v. Drew
as 1:2007cv02068
Petitioner:
Sydney George Robinson
Respondent:
D.B. Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Taylor v. Drew
as 1:2007cv01923
Petitioner:
Christopher B Taylor
Respondent:
D.B. Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dixon v. Drew et al
as 1:2007cv01895
Plaintiff:
Wilmer L. Dixon, III
Defendant:
D.B. Drew and T. Logan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Petersen v. Drew (INMATE3)
as 2:2007cv00785
Plaintiff:
Allan A. Petersen
Defendant:
Darlene Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
