Cases 51 - 59 of 59
Perry v. City of St. Helens
as 3:2008cv00638
Plaintiff:
Danny Perry
Defendant:
City of St. Helens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00300
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Citizens for Constitutional Fairness et al v. Jackson County et al
as 1:2008cv03015
Plaintiff:
Citizens for Constitutional Fairness, Pacific Western of Medford, L.L.C., Duane Cross and others
Defendant:
Jacson County and Danny Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00131
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hurliman v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2007cv06373
Plaintiff:
Dannis L. Hurliman and Dannis L. Hurliman
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Abeton Inc et al v. Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC et al
as 3:2007cv00803
Plaintiff:
Abeton Inc, Abeton Inc, Danny L Johnson and others
Defendant:
Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC, Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC, Louis H Diamond and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Linebaugh v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2007cv00794
Plaintiff:
Danny L. Linebaugh
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Romero v. Belleque
as 1:2007cv00727
Petitioner:
Danny J. Romero
Respondent:
Brian Belleque
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Romero v. Vargo et al
as 3:2007cv06083
Plaintiff:
Danny Romero
Defendant:
Vargo, Becker, Ted Randall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
