Cases 51 - 60 of 21,905
Flickinger v. Castillo et al
as 5:2024cv02915
Plaintiff:
Jason Archie Flickinger
Defendant:
Jaqueline Reyes Castillo, Robert Crisp, Pedro Quintero and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lettieri v. Facebook
as 4:2024cv02935
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Facebook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
(HC) Coker v. Cambell
as 1:2024cv00566
Petitioner:
Charles David Coker
Respondent:
T. Cambell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Agensys, Inc. v. The Regents of The University of California et al
as 2:2024cv03961
Plaintiff:
Agensys, Inc.
Defendant:
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, a corporation, Norbert Peekhaus and Hans David Ulmert
Miller et al v. County of Shasta et al
as 2:2024at00588
Plaintiff:
Jessica Miller, S. H. and Anna Miller
Defendant:
County of Shasta, Alicia Endecott, David Hendrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOPEZ PEREZ v. GARLAND et al
as 2:2024cv03954
Plaintiff:
ANDY ROMAN LOPEZ PEREZ
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, Alexandro N Mayorkas, Director UR M JADDOU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
