Cases 51 - 60 of 556
Davis v. Crow
as 4:2022cv00279
Petitioner:
Shiron D Davis
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hayes, et al v. Owen, et al
as 4:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
Anita Jean Hayes, Salinda Eve Hayes and MDH
Defendant:
Scott Owen, Jon Copeland, Jeff Prentice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hayes et al v. Owen et al
as 4:2022cv00274
Plaintiff:
Anita Jean Hayes and Salinda Eve Hayes
Defendant:
Scott Owen, Jon Copeland, Michael Kitchens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hayes et al v. Owen et al
as 4:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
Anita Jean Hayes and Salinda Eve Hayes
Defendant:
Jon Copeland, Michael Kitchens, Kristen Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hayes et al v. Owen et al
as 4:2022cv00231
Plaintiff:
Anita Jean Hayes, Salinda Eve Hayes and MDH
Defendant:
Scott Owen, Jon Copeland, Washington County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wiles v. Davis et al
as 5:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
Taylor Wiles
Defendant:
Jesse Davis and MDR Construction Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Davis v. Stitt et al
as 5:2022cv00302
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Davis
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Amber Martin, Mark Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Snyder, et al
as 4:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
Mr. Richard Davis and Mr Richard Davis
Defendant:
Michael Snyder and Max Ryden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Harris v. Kushner et al
as 5:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
Brandon Shane Harris
Defendant:
FNU Kushner, FNU Henderson, FNU Vajilo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Sharon Denise Davis
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
