Cases 51 - 60 of 84
Jose V. Estrada et al v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
as 2:2014cv04014
Plaintiff:
Mildred Placa Altieri, Camilo Falcon Arroyo, Efrain Cruz Batista and others
Defendant:
AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Does and others
Hold v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2013cv05814
Plaintiff:
Sean Alexander Hold
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco Police Department, Greg Suhr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phyllis Adams, et al. v. Astrazeneca, et al.
as 2:2013cv01348
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Adams, Debra Akins, Mary Allen and others
Defendant:
AstraZeneca LP and Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
Adams, et al. v. Astrazeneca, et al.
as 3:2012cv03083
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Adams , Debra Akins , Mary Allen and others
Defendant:
Astrazeneca LP and Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Felipe Dejesus Ake v. Martin D Biter
as 5:2012cv01215
Petitioner:
Felipe Dejesus Ake
Respondent:
Martin D. Biter
Ake v. Biter
as 2:2012cv01560
Petitioner:
Felipe Dejesus Ake
Respondent:
Martin D. Biter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hipolito DeJesus v. NYK Canopus et al
as 2:2011cv10318
Defendant:
Codex Carriers Inc, Columbia Shipmanagement Ltd, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Hipolito DeJesus
Fraizier et al v. Wireless Lifestyle, Inc.
as 3:2011cv05192
Plaintiff:
Kevin Fraizier and DeJesus Libran
Defendant:
Wireless Lifestyle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fraizier et al v. Wireless Lifestyle, Inc.
as 4:2011cv05192
Plaintiff:
Kevin Fraizier and DeJesus Libran
Defendant:
Wireless Lifestyle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Federal National Mortgage Association, its and/or Successors v. Gonzalez
as 2:2011cv02385
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage Association, its and/or Successors
Defendant:
Jose Dejesus Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
