Cases 51 - 60 of 100
Tidmore v. Georgia Dept of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00883
Petitioner:
Brian K. Tidmore
Respondent:
Georgia Dept of Corrections, Wheeler Correctional Facility, Corrections Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salvador v. Ga Dept of Corrections et al
as 4:2016cv00189
Plaintiff:
Douglas Salvador
Defendant:
Ga Dept of Corrections, Bruce Lee, Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Georgia Dept of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv00595
Plaintiff:
Walter Stephen Parker
Defendant:
Georgia Dept of Corrections and Homer Bryson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. State of Georgia et al
as 4:2015cv00143
Petitioner:
Randy Edwards
Respondent:
State of Georgia, Attorney General, Georgia Dept of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sutcliffe v. Duffy et al
as 1:2015cv02310
Plaintiff:
John E. Sutcliffe
Defendant:
William Duffy, The United States, Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Duffy et al
as 1:2015cv02309
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L. Crawford
Defendant:
William Duffy, The United States, Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day et al
as 4:2015cv00066
Petitioner:
Donald L. Day, Jr.
Respondent:
Dept of Corrections, Dept of Offender Rebilltation and Stanly Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sewell v. Chatman et al
as 6:2014cv00067
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Sewell
Defendant:
Bruce Chatman, Windell Fowler, Larry Brewton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. State of Georgia et al
as 4:2014cv00120
Petitioner:
Randy Edwards
Respondent:
State of Georgia, Rome Judicial Circuit and Georgia Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reese v. Georgia Dept. of Corrections et al
as 6:2014cv00043
Plaintiff:
Sammie Lee Reese
Defendant:
Georgia Dept. of Corrections, Robert Toole and Lisa Fountain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
