Cases 51 - 60 of 86
DILLON et al v. SKI SHAWNEE, INC.
as 3:2014cv01576
Plaintiff:
M.D. and DESIREE MORA-DILLON
Defendant:
Ski Shawnee, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CATLETT v. COLVIN
as 2:2014cv04244
Plaintiff:
JOSETTE DESIREE CATLETT
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Crane v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2014cv01097
Plaintiff:
Desiree K. Crane
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JONES
as 3:2014cv00099
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DESIREE G. JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Warner et al v. Pronobis
as 3:2014cv00644
Plaintiff:
Desiree Warner and Aubrey Warner
Defendant:
Lynn Pronobis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanchez v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv02479
Plaintiff:
Desiree L. Sanchez
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
DEUYOUR et al v. BF GOODRICH COMPANY et al
as 2:2013cv60015
Plaintiff:
LAURIE DEUYOUR , NICHOLAS DEUYOUR and DESIREE DEUYOUR
Defendant:
BF GOODRICH COMPANY , CARRIER CORPORATION , THE DEXTER CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Banks v. An Unknown Named Number of NSA Agents et al
as 1:2013cv02062
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
An Unknown Named Number of NSA Agents, At Least four FCC Forrest City unknown named Agents of the bop operating from the special housing Unit, An Unknown Named Number of Other United States Government Agents and others
Amicu:
Nancy-Ann E. DeParle
Fifth_party_defendant:
Mona K. Sutphen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
