Cases 51 - 60 of 303
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
George v. Product Slingshot, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00296
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Think 3D/Prelude, Inc. and Product Slingshot, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dr. David George and Dr David George
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00139
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00213
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
GREENE v. DEARBORN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS et al
as 4:2018cv00099
Defendant:
DEARBORN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, DEARBORN COUNTY, INDIANA, DOES 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
TABITHA GREENE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OAKLEY, INC. v. SWAMI PROPERTY SUNMAN INC. et al
as 4:2018cv00085
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, CHIRAG PATEL and SWAMI PROPERTY SUNMAN INC.
Plaintiff:
OAKLEY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
LUXOTTICA GROUP S.P.A. et al v. AVNI PETROLEUM, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv00537
Defendant:
AVNI PETROLEUM, INC., DOES 1-10, PARI, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
LUXOTTICA GROUP S.P.A. and OAKLEY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00530
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
