Cases 51 - 60 of 108
Marcus Smith v. Doris Falkenrath
as 23-1076
Petitioner / Appellant:
Marcus D. Smith
Respondent / Appellee:
Doris Falkenrath
Peoples v. Falkenrath
as 2:2022cv04192
Petitioner:
Scott Peoples and Scott Levi Peoples
Respondent:
Doris Falkenrath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Dutcher v. Anne Precythe, et al
as 22-3613
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Dutcher
Defendant / Appellee:
Anne L. Precythe, Director, Missouri Department of Corrections, Doris Falkenrath, Warden, Jefferson City Correctional Center, Raina Martin, Assistant Warden, Jefferson City Correctional Center and others
Paul v. Precythe et al
as 2:2022cv04186
Plaintiff:
Rico Ricardo Paul
Defendant:
Director Anne L. Precythe, Jason Lewis, Anna Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. Falkenrath
as 4:2022cv00826
Petitioner:
Willie Warren
Respondent:
Doris Falkenrath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LaJuan Hayes v. Anne Precythe, et al
as 22-3554
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LaJuan Hayes
Defendant / Appellee:
Anne L. Precythe, Missouri Department of Corrections/Jefferson City Correctional Center Director, Brook Whittom, LPN, Doris Falkenrath, Warden and others
Wallace v. Falkenrath
as 4:2022cv01276
Petitioner:
Lawrence Wallace
Respondent:
Doris Falkenrath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. Falkenrath
as 4:2022cv00721
Petitioner:
Zeno E. Sims
Respondent:
Doris Falkenrath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rickey Norton v. Doris Falkenrath
as 22-3249
Petitioner:
Rickey R. Norton
Respondent:
Doris Falkenrath, Warden
Deshawn Smith v. Doris Falkenrath
as 22-3237
Petitioner / Appellant:
Deshawn Smith
Respondent / Appellee:
Doris Falkenrath, Superintendent
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
