Cases 51 - 60 of 300
ENGLISH v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv05112
Plaintiff:
EARNESTINE ENGLISH
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOLCHESKY v. ENGLISH
as 3:2015cv01722
Plaintiff:
GARY WOLCHESKY
Defendant:
RICHARD W. ENGLISH, JSC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ENGLISH v. MCCAY et al
as 1:2015cv01475
Plaintiff:
DAVID ENGLISH
Defendant:
FREEHOLDER MCCAY, DAVID OWENS, JOHN JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ENGLISH v. CITY OF CAMDEN, NJ et al
as 1:2015cv01251
Plaintiff:
DAVID ENGLISH
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, NJ, MATTHEW DIDOMENIO, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOATHER v. FUGGI LAW FIRM et al
as 3:2014cv07629
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND R. HOATHER
Defendant:
FUGGI LAW FIRM , CATHERINE KOSLEZ , ROBERT FUGGI, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
O'TOOLE et al v. KLINGEN et al
as 2:2014cv06333
Plaintiff:
MICHELE O'TOOLE , MARYANN MAURO , CORD MEYER and others
Defendant:
ROBERT KLINGEN, CHARLES JANDRIS, LIZ VILLANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STILLITTANO v. REDCATS USA/UNITED RETAIL INC. et al
as 2:2014cv05402
Plaintiff:
ZACHARIAH STILLITTANO
Defendant:
REDCATS USA/UNITED RETAIL INC. , DAVID ENGLISH and Avenue Stores, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MCCANN v. FALATO et al
as 3:2014cv04896
Plaintiff:
JAMES MCCANN
Defendant:
DEIRDRE M. FALATO, DAVID B. MCKEE, MILDRED T. MASTROBERTE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
ISOLA v. FALATO et al
as 3:2014cv04897
Plaintiff:
ALBERT A. ISOLA
Defendant:
DEIRDRE M. FALATO, DAVID B. MCKEE, MILDRED T. MASTROBERTE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
ENGLISH v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2014cv04866
Petitioner:
LEWIS ENGLISH
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, CAMDEN, NEW JERSEY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
