Cases 51 - 60 of 190
NEWMAN v TICE et al
as 3:2021cv00105
Defendant:
RHU JOHN DOE, LT PRITZ, CAPT BOYCE and others
Plaintiff:
DARRYL B. NEWMAN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Moore v. Tice
as 2:2021cv02303
Defendant:
Eric Tice
Petitioner:
Hakeem Moore
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2021cv00139
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY
Petitioner:
JAMES EARL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Boyd v. Tice et al
as 1:2021cv00886
Respondent:
Eric Tice and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Petitioner:
Tyrell Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HUMMERT v. TICE et al
as 1:2021cv00849
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania, David W. Sunday, Jr. and Warden Eric Tice
Petitioner:
BRIAN DAVID HUMMERT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COLES v. TICE et al
as 2:2021cv02133
Respondent:
ERIC TICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
DEMANUEL COLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JONES v. COPELIC et al
as 3:2021cv00080
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JONES and ROBERT MILLER
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, C/O BENDICK, C/O MCGOUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
YOUNG v. LAFFERTY et al
as 3:2021cv00078
Defendant:
DR. M. THOMPSON, DR. SMUCKER, KIERRA LAFFERTY and others
Plaintiff:
LEONARD YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
YOUNKIN v. TICE et al
as 3:2021cv00076
Defendant:
NURSE KELLY STEWART, SUPERINTENDANT ERIC TICE, MEDICAL DIRECTOR BRIAN HYDE and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL C. YOUNKIN, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MYERS v. TICE et al
as 3:2021cv00069
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER D. MYERS
Defendant:
KANSKY DELISMA and ERIC TICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
