Cases 51 - 59 of 59
FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE v. APPLICATIONS INTERNA
as 2:2003cv01512
Plaintiff:
FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.
Defendant:
APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
Thirdparty_defendant:
COMPUTER AID, INC
Counter_claimant:
COMPUTER AID, INC
Counter_defendant:
APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION , FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM LTD. and FEDEX SUPPLY CHAIN SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Marshall v. FEDEX Ground
as 3:2009cv02531
Plaintiff:
Guy Marshall
Defendant:
FEDEX Ground
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
MITCHELL v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2008cv05414
Plaintiff:
DAVID MITCHELL
Defendant:
FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
TARR vs FEDEX GROUND
as 2:2008cv01454
Plaintiff:
LEO Z. TARR
Defendant:
FEDEX GROUND
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WILLIS v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2008cv01139
Plaintiff:
DEREK D. WILLIS
Defendant:
FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
PROTECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. STI HOLDINGS, INC.
as 2:2008cv00733
Plaintiff:
PROTECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY and FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant:
STI HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BLAUVELT v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2008cv00355
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BLAUVELT and MICHAEL BLAUVELT
Defendant:
FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
RICHES v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2007cv04009
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant:
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, JOHN E. POTTER, FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOWELL et al v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2007cv02858
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK DOUGLAS HOWELL, JR. and TEMPLE JACKSON
Defendant:
FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
