Cases 51 - 60 of 75
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01786
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
USA v. $8,000.00 in United States Currency et al
as 3:2011cv00772
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$8,000.00 in United States Currency and $133.11 in United States Currency
Claimant:
Christopher Plummer and Franklin Power and Light, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00941
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ojeda v. McCarthy
as 3:2010cv00768
Plaintiff:
Franklin Ojeda
Defendant:
Christopher McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chimbo v. Chimbo
as 3:2009cv01571
Plaintiff:
Teresa Chimbo, Jose Chimbo and M.B.C.
Defendant:
Franklin Prod., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
USA v. 895 Lake Avenue, et al
as 3:1999cv01772
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
895 Lake Avenue Greenwich, CT
Claimant:
Sundew Intl Ltd , Cheryl Lacoff , David S. Rosse and others
Counter_defendant:
USA
Cross_claimant:
Franklin Amer Life Ins Co , First Natl Ins Co of Amer , Franklin Protective Life Ins Co and others
Cross_defendant:
Cheryl Lacoff
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
