Cases 51 - 60 of 68
GE Commercial Distribution Finance Corporation v. T & F Cycles, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03120
Plaintiff:
GE Commercial Distribution Finance Corporation
Defendant:
Kara Metcalf, Travis Metcalf, Franklin J. Saunders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bechdoldt v. Loveland et al
as 6:2010cv01041
Defendant:
Franklin Dale Bechdoldt and Robert J. Loveland
Plaintiff:
Inna Yaraslavovna Bechdoldt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bechdoldt v. Loveland et al
as 3:2010cv01041
Defendant:
Franklin Dale Bechdoldt and Robert J. Loveland
Plaintiff:
Inna Yaraslavovna Bechdoldt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Munoz v. Thomas
as 3:2010cv00407
Petitioner:
Roy Franklin Munoz
Respondent:
J. E. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Franklin v. Clarke et al
as 1:2010cv00382
Defendant:
Marty Clarke, Colin Fagan, Glenn Ford and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Franklin v. Clarke et al
as 3:2010cv00382
Defendant:
Marty Clarke, Colin Fagan, Glenn Ford and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Franklin -vs- Nooth
as 3:2009cv00939
Petitioner:
Daniel Paul Franklin
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv06175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00673
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00673
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
