Cases 51 - 60 of 767
Olson, Daniel v. Sauk County et al
as 3:2022cv00562
Plaintiff:
Daniel M. Olson
Defendant:
Sauk County, Aegis Corporation, Cross Jenks Mercer Maffei and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Schmidt
as 2:2022cv01055
Plaintiff:
Ronald Richard Johnson
Defendant:
Gary J Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ghashiyah (Khan) v. Carr et al
as 2:2022cv00924
Plaintiff:
Tayr Kilaab al Ghashiyah (Khan)
Defendant:
Kevin Carr, Brian Foster, Anthony Meli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Casey et al v. Sciascia et al
as 2:2022cv01026
Plaintiff:
Nicole M Casey, Annette M Casey and Zoey L Casey
Defendant:
Joseph Sciascia, Teri Strohshein, Gary Probst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lindenberger, Deborah v. Cane Bay Partners VI, LLLP et al
as 3:2022cv00427
Plaintiff:
Deborah Lindenberger
Defendant:
Cane Bay Partners VI, LLLP, Kirk Chewning, David Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Tuinstra v. Boughton
as 2:2022cv00945
Petitioner:
Nicholas Tuinstra
Defendant:
Warden Gary Boughton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Caldwell v. Hoffman et al
as 2:2022cv00678
Plaintiff:
Algernon Caldwell, Jr
Defendant:
CO Gary Hoffman, John Does, Sgt Matushak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joachim, Gary v. Kijakazi, Kilolo
as 3:2022cv00346
Plaintiff:
Gary M. Joachim
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Devroy v. Boughton
as 2:2022cv00727
Petitioner:
Brian L Devroy
Respondent:
Gary Boughton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lizalek v. Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2022cv00714
Petitioner:
Gary C Lizalek
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
