Cases 51 - 60 of 64
Gill et al v. U.S. Bank, National Assn. et al
as 1:2011cv00160
Plaintiff:
Michael Gill and Heather Heitmeyer
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, National Assn. , Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. , China Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00259
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ferrell v. Louden et al
as 2:2009cv00152
Plaintiff:
Theresa L. Ferrell
Defendant:
Thomas Louden, Douglas Shoemaker and Elizabeth Gill
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Gilles et al v. Lincoln Electric Company et al
as 1:2008wf17201
Defendant:
Lincoln Electric Company, Hobart Brothers Company, ESAB Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert J Gilles, Robert J Gilles, Norma Gilles and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Gill v. Kovach et al
as 4:2008cv01839
Plaintiff:
Heidi Gill
Defendant:
Richard Kovach, City of Warren Ohio, John Mandopoulos and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2008cv01572
Plaintiff:
Floyd R Gill, Jr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security, Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Walter Gill Enterprises, Inc. v. The Mid-America Management Corporation
as 1:2008cv00642
Plaintiff:
Walter Gill Enterprises, Inc. and Walter Gill Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
The Mid-America Management Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Ealy v. Vore et al
as 3:2008cv00059
Petitioner:
Larry E Ealy
Defendant:
Dave Vore, Glen Mackintosh, Doctor Gill and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
