Cases 51 - 60 of 245
Jamal Damon Hendrix v. Cox et al
as 2:2015cv00560
Defendant:
Linda C. Adams, Anderson, Michael Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Ervin et al
as 2:2015cv00514
Defendant:
Greg Cox, Steven Ervin, Jerry Howell and others
Plaintiff:
Robert T. Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Cox et al
as 2:2015cv00502
Defendant:
Nevada DOC Director Greg Cox, SDCC Grievance Coordinator and State of Nevada
Plaintiff:
John Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2015cv00155
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Jayson Artinger, Renee Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Helfrich v. Cox et al
as 2:2015cv00384
Defendant:
James Greg Cox, Jerry Howell, Warden Dwight Neven and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Jason Helfrich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boston v. Baca et al
as 3:2015cv00124
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Greg Cox, E.K. McDaniel and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Boston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lisle v. Sandoval, et al.
as 2:2015cv00351
Respondent:
Renee Baker, Catherine Cortez Masto, Greg Cox and others
Petitioner:
Kevin James Lisle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lyons v. Baca et al
as 3:2015cv00126
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Catherine Cortez-Masto, Greg Cox and others
Plaintiff:
William R. Lyons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seely v. Baca et al
as 3:2015cv00118
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Catherine Cortez-Masto, Greg Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Edward E. Seely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Cox et al
as 3:2015cv00115
Defendant:
James Greg Cox, Leavett and Warden Neven
Plaintiff:
Henry Frometa Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
