Cases 51 - 60 of 945
Horne v. Rardin
as 4:2023cv01397
Petitioner:
Gregory L. Horne
Defendant:
Warden E. Rardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Raymond v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01882
Plaintiff:
Gregory Raymond
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kimble v. Gleckler et al
as 1:2023cv00350
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kimble
Defendant:
Officer Brett Gleckler and Officer Mark Longworth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maxwell v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01846
Plaintiff:
Gregory Maxwell, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cox et al v. Nord et al
as 1:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Gregory C. Cox, Jr., Holmer J. Jenkins and David Bennett
Defendant:
Prosecutor Steven Nord, Det. Brad Layman, Det. Aaron Bollinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins et al v. Nord et al
as 1:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
Holmer J. Jenkins, Gregory C. Cox, Jr. and David Bennett
Defendant:
Prosecutor Steven Norder, Brad Layman, Aaron Bollenger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01622
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard & Co., Inc. and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brown v. Kline et al
as 4:2023cv00787
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Brown
Defendant:
Dr. James Kline, Dr. Andrew D. Eddy and Karen Stanforth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hoover v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01235
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lee Hoover
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hatfield et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01195
Plaintiff:
Tammy L. Hatfield and Gregory Hatfield
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
