Cases filed in New York
Cases 51 - 60 of 409
Morgan v. Sharps Compliance Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv06779
Plaintiff: Anthony Morgan
Defendant: Sharps Compliance Corp., Sharon R. Gabrielson, Gary R. Enzor and others
Justice v. Sharps Compliance Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv06689
Plaintiff: Jeffrey D. Justice, II
Defendant: Sharps Compliance Corp., Gary R. Enzor, Sharon R. Gabrielson and others
Holmes v. The City of New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv06662
Plaintiff: Benjiman Holmes
Defendant: The City of New York, Anthony Acosta and DHS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Waterman v. Sharps Compliance Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv06697
Plaintiff: Marc Waterman
Defendant: Sharps Compliance Corp., Gary R. Enzor, Sharon R. Gabrielson and others
Holmes v. Healthfirst et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv06683
Plaintiff: Benjamin Holmes
Defendant: Healthfirst, Medicaid and Medicare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Holmes v. Capital One, N.A. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00823
Plaintiff: Christina Holmes
Defendant: Capital One, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Rodenbach v. Sharps Compliance Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv06647
Plaintiff: David Rodenbach
Defendant: Sharps Compliance Corp., Sharon R. Gabrielson, Gary R. Enzor and others
Holm v. Verly et al
as 1:2022cv04533
Plaintiff: Dennis Holm
Defendant: Edison Verly and JB Hunt Transport Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Holmes v. Miller We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv06388
Petitioner: Marvin Holmes
Respondent: Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00551
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?