Cases 51 - 60 of 75
GERALD et al v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2008cv00706
Plaintiff:
DONZELL GERALD
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, J. DAVID DONAHUE, CRAIG HANKS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Scott v. Donahue et al
as 3:2008cv00206
Plaintiff:
Travis Scott
Defendant:
David Donahue, Dr Anita Glasson, Dr Eli and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FERGUSON et al v. HANKS et al
as 1:2008cv00140
Plaintiff:
HARRY E. FERGUSON, ALVERTON LERCH, MICHAEL HART and others
Defendant:
CRAIG HANKS, NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYERS v. HANKS
as 2:2008cv00026
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER DALE MYERS
Respondent:
CRAIG HANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DISHMAN v. HANKS
as 1:2008cv00092
Petitioner:
TODD M. DISHMAN
Respondent:
CRAIG HANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HARRISON v. HANKS
as 1:2007cv01292
Petitioner:
HARRY HARRISON
Respondent:
CRAIG HANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILSON v. HANKS et al
as 2:2007cv00243
Plaintiff:
SHAVAUGHN CARLOS WILSON
Defendant:
CRAIG HANKS, KEVIN GILMORE, MATTHEW LEOHR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MUZQUIZ v. HANKS
as 1:2007cv01080
Petitioner:
KURT A. MUZQUIZ
Respondent:
CRAIG HANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Riches v. Bonds et al
as 3:2007cv00375
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Barry Bonds, Allan Selig and Hank Aaron's Bat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Witham v. Hanks
as 3:2007cv00371
Petitioner:
James Witham, Jr
Respondent:
Craig Hanks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
