Cases 51 - 60 of 82
Chase Financing Inc. v. Prutch et al
as 1:2014cv07231
Plaintiff:
Chase Financing Inc.
Defendant:
John Prutch, Jon Pritchett and M.E. Hank Durschlag
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yoo et al v. J&A USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv04249
Defendant:
J&A Service, Inc., J&A USA, Inc., Hank Kim and others
Plaintiff:
Won Ho Park and Sean Yoo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hanks v. Kelly
as 9:2014cv00618
Petitioner:
Terris Hanks
Respondent:
Charles F. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hanke v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
as 1:2013cv05915
Plaintiff:
Doris Hanke
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hanks v. John or Jane Doe et al
as 1:2012cv07120
Plaintiff:
Davin Hanks
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas et al v. Long et al
as 1:2011cv09570
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas , Law Debenture Trust Company of New York and Wilmington Trust Company
Defendant:
George H. Long , Dawn Smith-Pliner , Ethan T. Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TYLER et al v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP
as 1:2011cv09000
Plaintiff:
Ursula Tyler , Bonnie Boerste , Robert Burns and others
Defendant:
Merck sharp & dohme corp
Pecial_master:
John D. Feerick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv05528
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
De Jesus v. 47th Hotel Associates LLC et al
as 1:2011cv05925
Plaintiff:
Francisco De Jesus
Defendant:
47th Hotel Associates LLC, Hank Fried and Brandon Fried
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
