Cases 51 - 60 of 2,254
John Hardee v. Christopher Walz
as 23-6966
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN T. HARDEE
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRIS WALZ, Superintendent, in individual and official capacity, FELICIA M. COWAN, Assistant Superintendent, in individual and official capacity, WINSTON BHAGIRATH, Captain, in individual and official capacity and others
Maldonado v. Clarke
as 2:2023cv00486
Petitioner:
Osman Giovanni Acosta Maldonado
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Ragin v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-6955
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN RAGIN
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Department of Corrections, JEFFERY ARTRIP, Warden and CHADWICK DOTSON
Phoenix v. Clarke et al
as 3:2023cv00615
Plaintiff:
Daniel William Phoenix
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Dr. Mark Amonette, Steve Herrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Anderson v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00618
Plaintiff:
John David Anderson, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, David Robinson, Gregory Holloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wesley Earnest v. Keith Davis
as 23-6934
Petitioner / Appellant:
WESLEY BRIAN EARNEST
Respondent / Appellee:
KEITH W. DAVIS, Warden and HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director Virginia Department of Corrections
Denzel Chandler v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-6929
Petitioner / Appellant:
DENZEL JOSHUA CHANDLER
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director
Tariq Amin v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-6933
Petitioner / Appellant:
TARIQ RASHAD AMIN
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director
Christopher Bean v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-6921
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER ALAN BEAN
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE and CHADWICK DOTSON
Gray v. Clarke
as 1:2023cv01275
Petitioner:
David B. Gray
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
