Cases 51 - 60 of 168
HIGGINS v. COLVIN
as 5:2016cv01002
Plaintiff:
PAMELA HIGGINS
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HIGGINS v. LAW FIRM OF ALLAN C. SMITH, P.C. et al
as 2:2015cv05473
Plaintiff:
AMANDA HIGGINS
Defendant:
LAW FIRM OF ALLAN C. SMITH, P.C., CACH, LLC and X,Y,Z CORPORATIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
HIGGINS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2015cv05381
Plaintiff:
BARBARA L. HIGGINS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BLAKE v. MYLAN N.V. et al
as 2:2015cv01131
Plaintiff:
MARSHA BLAKE
Defendant:
MYLAN N.V. , HEATHER BRESCH , WENDY CAMERON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DUNLEAVY et al v. MORTIMER ELECTRIC, INC.
as 3:2015mc00052
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. DUNLEAVY , JAMES J. FERRY, II , TODD MIKEC and others
Defendant:
MORTIMER ELECTRIC, INC.
HIGGINS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2015cv04605
Plaintiff:
DAVID HIGGINS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C., JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BISSELL v. GRAVELEY BROTHERS ROOFING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2015cv04677
Plaintiff:
RUTH MARY BISSELL
Defendant:
GRAVELEY BROTHERS ROOFING CORPORATION, MICHAEL GRAVELEY, JOHN GRAVELEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
MCDONALD v. DELBALSO et al
as 3:2015cv00138
Petitioner:
JULIAN DAIN MCDONALD
Respondent:
THERESA DELBALSO, WILLIAM J. HIGGINS and KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SHINE v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY PA et al
as 2:2015cv02354
Plaintiff:
BRYAN J. SHINE
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PA, MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, PRIMECARE MEDICAL INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Higgins v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00594
Plaintiff:
Ida Higgins
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
