Cases 51 - 60 of 78
Becker v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 4:2013cv01894
Plaintiff:
Dalton V Becker
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Code v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 4:2013cv00801
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Code and Michael Code
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Foremost Insurance Company of Grand Rapids, Michigan v. Home Depot
as 4:2013cv01081
Plaintiff:
Foremost Insurance Company of Grand Rapids, Michigan
Defendant:
Home Depot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Bahr v. Homer TCL, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00274
Plaintiff:
Amanda Bahr
Defendant:
Homer TCL, Inc. , Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and The Home Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Hesser v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 4:2013cv00227
Plaintiff:
Roy Hesser
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
In Re: Emerson Electric Co. Wet/Dry Vac Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
as 4:2012md02382
Plaintiff:
Jeff Hale , Raymond Gray , Andrew Bowers and others
Defendant:
Emerson Electric Company , Sears Holdings Corporation , Sears, Roebuck & Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whaley v. Home Depot USA, Inc.
as 4:2012cv01353
Plaintiff:
Yvette Whaley
Defendant:
Home Depot USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
