Cases 51 - 60 of 129
Cohea v. Jones et al
as 2:2012cv01294
Plaintiff:
Danny James Cohea
Defendant:
J Jones and B Hammans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamon v. Amrheign et al
as 1:2012cv00296
Plaintiff:
Barry Louis Lamon
Defendant:
B. Amrheign, Austin, Brad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goroy v. California Dept of Corrections et al
as 2:2012cv00487
Defendant:
California Dept of Corrections, Director Matthew Cate, J Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Cameron Andrew Gordy
Smith v. State of California et al
as 5:2011cv06715
Plaintiff:
Robert P. Smith, III
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, D. Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. State of California et al
as 3:2011cv06715
Plaintiff:
Robert P. Smith, III
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, D. Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Mejia et al
as 2:2011cv03328
Plaintiff:
Patrick Scott
Defendant:
E. Mejia, Kauffman, M. Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JESSE FREGOSO v. WELLS FARGO DEALER SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv10089
Defendant:
Cashcall, Inc., PROFESSIONAL COLLECTIONS CONSULTANTS, INC., Santander Consumer USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE FREGOSO
Unknown:
Cecil J Jones and Andrew K Stutman
Scott v. Mejia et al
as 4:2011cv05397
Plaintiff:
Patrick Scott
Defendant:
E. Mejia, Kauffman, M. Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deloris J Jones v. Jo Anne B Barnhart
as 5:2001cv00937
Unknown:
Lourdes G Baird
Defendant:
Jo Anne B Barnhart
Plaintiff:
Deloris J Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gray v. Tilton et al
as 2:2011cv02103
Plaintiff:
Ricky Gray
Defendant:
James Tilton, Robert Wong, Matthew Cates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
