Cases 51 - 60 of 394
Hueter et al v. AST Telecomm LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00207
Plaintiff:
Steven Jay Pincus Hueter, Michael S. Kirk, Candyman and others
Defendant:
Fiu J. Saelua, American Samoa Power Authority, Raj Deo and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00188
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Resco, Inc. et al v. Bigelow et al
as 1:2021cv00183
Defendant:
James Chan, Doe Defendants 1-50, Brian Stewart and others
Plaintiff:
Locations, LLC and Resco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Irwin et al v. 90210 Management Company, LLC
as 1:2021cv00169
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, 90210 Management Company, LLC, Jane Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Shelli Irwin and James R. Irwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Grandinetti v. Tabe et al
as 1:2021cv00149
Respondent:
Stanton C. Oshiro, James Tabe, Michael Ebesugawa and others
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Petitioner:
Francis Grandinetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abing et al v. Evers et al
as 1:2021cv00095
Defendant:
Catherine Awakuni Colon, Ryan Summers Little, Rebecca Salwin and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Duane DeShaw, Chester Noel Abing and Susan Kay Broer-DeShaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Macanas v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00049
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Ross James Macanas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Knapp et al v. Ige et al
as 1:2020cv00537
Plaintiff:
Stefanie Nolff, Bill Singleton, Linda Knapp and others
Defendant:
Clare E. Connor, Harry Kim and David Ige
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ballering v. Morgan Stanley LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00527
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage, Mr. Joseph Miller, Mr. Robert H. Herz and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Lynn Ballering
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curtis v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00490
Plaintiff:
James J. Curtis, Jr.
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
