Cases 51 - 60 of 534
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv10354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Nung Tan, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 09-55329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NUNG FA TAN and RUI YE LI
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, U.S. Attorney General, CONDOLEEZA RICE, U.S. Secretary of State, ROBERT GOLDBERG, Consul General, United States Consulate, Guangzhou China and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00863
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Elia v. Napolitano et al
as 1:2009cv00860
Plaintiff:
Eman Elia
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano, Jonathan Scharfen, Andrea J. Quarantillo and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Alireza Samii v. Jonathan Scharfen et al
as 2:2008cv06981
Defendant:
Jane Arellano, David M. Douglas and Jonathan Scharfen
Plaintiff:
Alireza Samii
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
