Cases 51 - 60 of 69
BARNES v. DAVIS
as 5:2012cv00079
Plaintiff:
DENNIS A BARNES
Defendant:
KEN DAVIS, QUINTON HOLLIS and JACKSON COUNTY POLICE OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reardon v. Gummels et al
as 1:2012cv20460
Plaintiff:
Timothy Patrick Reardon, W.B Care Center, LLC and Q.I.S. Management, LLC
Defendant:
Ken Gummels, Marilyn Gummells, Jerry Hinson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CALLAWAY MANOR APARTMENTS LTD et al
as 5:2011cv00214
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CALLAWAY MANOR APARTMENTS LTD, DAVID PIERCY PLUMBING INC and JACKSON COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
STIMUS v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2010cv00063
Plaintiff:
MARK STIMUS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BARFIELD, JACKSON COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
