Cases 51 - 60 of 71
Frazier v. USA
as 7:2012cv00138
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Edward Frazier, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MacAlpine v. The United States
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2012mc00015
Petitioner:
James Edward MacAlpine
Respondent:
The United States
Nichols v. USA
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2012cv00205
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Edward Nichols
Defendant:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Frazier v. United States of America et al
as 5:2012hc02042
Petitioner:
James Edward Frazier, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America and Sarah Revell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MILES v. NADOLSKI et al
as 1:2011cv00684
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD MILES
Defendant:
PAT NADOLSKI and EUGENE MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GROSE v. ASTRUE
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2011cv00634
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD GROSE
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
FRANKLIN v. FRANKLIN et al
as 1:2011cv00602
Defendant:
JOHN ERIC FRANKLIN and CITY OF MEBANE N.C.
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD MILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. City of Goldsboro, North Carolina
as 5:2011mc00025
Plaintiff:
James Edward Harris
Defendant:
City of Goldsboro, North Carolina
Byrd v. USA
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2010cv00602
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Edward Byrd, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Harris v. City of Raleigh, NC et al
as 5:2010mc00056
Plaintiff:
James Edward Harris
Defendant:
City of Raleigh, NC, Phoenix Elizabeth and Catrice Wilson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.