Cases 51 - 60 of 61
John Durant v. Steel Systems Engineering, Inc.
as 2:2015cv05237
Plaintiff:
John Durant
Defendant:
Steel Systems Engineering, Inc.
John Durant v. Newport Childrens Medical Group At Mission, Inc.
as 8:2015cv01102
Plaintiff:
John Durant
Defendant:
Newport Childrens Medical Group At Mission Inc
Durant v. Grossmont Dermatology Medical Clinic Inc.
as 3:2015cv01553
Plaintiff:
John Durant
Defendant:
Grossmont Dermatology Medical Clinic Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501
Durant v. Sysmex America, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00593
Plaintiff:
John Durant
Defendant:
Sysmex America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
In the Matter of the Complaint of John Durante, Jr.
as 2:2011cv04042
Petitioner:
In the Matter of the Complaint of John Durante, Jr.
Respondent:
Robert McAuliffe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
McAuliffe v. Durante et al
as 2:2011cv03772
Cross Claimant:
John Durante, Jr.
Defendant:
John Durante, Jr. and James McAuliffe
Cross Defendant:
James McAuliffe
Plaintiff:
Robert McAuliffe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Vanterpool et al v. Alanis Security, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv23868
Plaintiff:
Felix Vanterpool, Jr, Felix Vanterpool, Jr, Elio Gonzalez and others
Defendant:
Alanis Security, Inc. and Wackenhut Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Ammex, Inc. v. John Durant, et al
as 09-1786
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMMEX, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DURANT, WILLIAM MORANDINI and JOHN DOES, Unknown Agents of the U.S. Bureau of Customs and Border Protection
Ammex, Incorporated v. Durant et al
as 2:2008cv13120
Plaintiff:
Ammex, Incorporated, Ammex, Incorporated and Ammex, Incorporated
Defendant:
John Durant, William Morandini and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bryson v. Durante
as 2:2008cv00325
Petitioner:
Richard Bryson
Respondent:
John Durante
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
