Cases 51 - 60 of 1,441
Ward v. Penzone et al
as 2:2017cv04758
Plaintiff:
Almalik Azeem Ward
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2017cv04764
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Gregory Jones
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duarte v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2017cv04747
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and others
Plaintiff:
Eliots Chavez Duarte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2017cv04745
Plaintiff:
Christian Collins
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wyatt v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2017cv04671
Plaintiff:
Calvin A Wyatt
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pete v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2017cv04674
Plaintiff:
Terrald Jamol Pete
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2017cv04647
Plaintiff:
Montecillio Moore
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Fulton Brock, Don Stapley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luque v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2017cv04590
Plaintiff:
Esteban Rodrigues Luque
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gipson v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2017cv04566
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio, Paul Penzone and others
Plaintiff:
Ethan Dane Gipson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Higginbothan v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2017cv04558
Plaintiff:
Dontae Markell Higginbothan
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
