Cases 51 - 60 of 100
Stuart v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv10159
Plaintiff:
Joyce Stuart
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., LOREAL USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson, LLC and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Testerman v Joyce et al
as 1:2026cv00243
Petitioner:
Gabriel Lee Testerman
Respondent:
Joseph Joyce and Wyoming Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05177
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bradshaw et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2026cv07151
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bradshaw, Paul Breslin, Joseph Ciampa and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07127
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07115
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05105
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Boyle et al v. FCA US, LLC
as 1:2026cv01065
Plaintiff:
Geraldine Boyle, Andrew Fotos, Patricia Fotos and others
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
