Cases 51 - 60 of 1,836
Lewis v. Gillis
as 4:2023cv00373
Petitioner:
Chaney K. Lewis
Respondent:
Warden Shawn Gillis
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00193
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Truesdail v. Thrill Korean Steak and Bar, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv05002
Plaintiff:
Devin Truesdail
Defendant:
Thrill Korean Steak and Bar, LLC, Jae Yim Shim, K-POP Korean BBQ & Bar, LLC and others
Lewis v. Ben Hill County, Georgia
as 4:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
Chaney K. Lewis
Defendant:
Ben Hill County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Freeman v. Perry
as 4:2023cv00334
Petitioner:
Dwight B. Freeman
Respondent:
James K. Perry
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BEY v. CARS R US OMG
as 5:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
SHATORIA K PITTS BEY
Defendant:
CARS R US OMG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
