Cases 51 - 60 of 115
Smith et al v. O'Malley et al
as 5:2016cv14077
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Smith , Steven Graysmark , John Eccles and others
Defendant:
Kelly O'Malley, Escrow and Title Services Inc. and Chicago Title Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Smith et al v. O'Malley et al
as 2:2016cv14070
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Smith, Steven Graysmark, John Eccles and others
Defendant:
Kelly O'Malley, Escrow and Title Services Inc. and Chicago Title Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
High Frequency Trading Systems LLC v. KCG BondPoint, a division of Knight Capital Americas LLC
as 2:2016cv13082
Plaintiff:
High Frequency Trading Systems LLC
Defendant:
KCG BondPoint, a division of Knight Capital Americas LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight v. USA
as 2:2016cv12354
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Otis Germaine Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Knight Capital Partners Corporation v. Henkel AG & Company, KGaA
as 2:2016cv12022
Plaintiff:
Knight Capital Partners Corporation
Defendant:
Henkel AG & Company, KGaA
Knight v. Bank of America N.A.
as 2:2016cv11662
Plaintiff:
Tonya Knight
Defendant:
Bank of America N.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, L. L. C. et al
as 2:2015cv12847
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, L. L. C. and Deutsche Bank National Trust, as Trustee for Indymac INDX Mortgage Loan Trust 2005 ARS, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificate Series 2005-ARS
Plaintiff:
Ethel Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alhaqq v. Knight
as 2:2015cv11731
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Alhaqq
Defendant:
Clarence J. Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
