Cases 51 - 60 of 478
Byrd v. Valles et al
as 0:2023cv61362
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Byrd
Defendant:
Daniel B. Valles, Leonard E. Diaz, Ronald Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
MINOR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19365
Plaintiff:
KENDRICK MINOR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KENDRICK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv18768
Plaintiff:
TYLER CALVIN KENDRICK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KENDRICK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv17076
Plaintiff:
JASON KENDRICK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kendrick v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hillsborough County)
as 8:2023cv01436
Petitioner:
Kenneth James Kendrick
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HALVORSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16118
Plaintiff:
KENDRICK HALVORSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kendricks v. Santana et al
as 8:2023cv01401
Plaintiff:
Silas Kendricks
Defendant:
L. Santana, T. Bowden and A. Johns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KENDRICK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14157
Plaintiff:
JOHN KENDRICK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anderson v. Weeks et al
as 0:2023cv61100
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Anderson
Defendant:
Gordon Weeks and Jaclyn Broudy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Worthey v. Nurse Eldrige et al
as 5:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
Tory Darnell Worthey
Defendant:
Nurse Eldrige, Lt. McEntire, C.O. Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
