Cases 51 - 60 of 1,698
Ward et al v. Trump et al
as 5:2020cv00122
Plaintiff:
Craig D Davison, Kent Krueger, Carl Pressley and others
Defendant:
Texas Dept of Criminal Justice, Each of the Governing Bodies of the 48 Unnamed States, Donald J Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn v. Davis et al
as 4:2020cv00562
Petitioner:
Michael Donte Dunn
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID and Donald Muniz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Patterson v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2020cv01392
Defendant:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Plaintiff:
Perry Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hill v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2020cv00374
Petitioner:
Victor Larkin Hill
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mendez Garcia v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2020cv01390
Petitioner:
Sammy Mendez Garcia
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mitchell, Jr v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2020cv00137
Petitioner:
Derrick Mitchell
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Cuilc et al
as 3:2020cv01375
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID, Mr NFN Huho, Mr NFN Johnson and others
Petitioner:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ingram v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2020cv00941
Petitioner:
Patrick Bernard Ingram
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Murphy v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 5:2020cv00089
Plaintiff:
Jacob Earl Murphy
Defendant:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirven-Hill v. Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas et al
as 3:2020cv01042
Petitioner:
Rosick D Kirven-Hill
Respondent:
Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas, NFN Deyne, NFN Norsworthy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
