Cases 51 - 60 of 91
LOVELL v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv05053
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY LOVELL
Defendant:
OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harper et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2019cv24327
Plaintiff:
Jessica Freire, Norman Allen Thompson, Kathy Euliano and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Allied Building Inspection Services, Inc. v. Lovell et al
as 2:2019cv00726
Defendant:
Allied Home Inspections Pro, LLC and Chris Shone Lovell
Plaintiff:
Allied Building Inspection Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1127
HERBRAND et al v BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03343
Plaintiff:
PAUL CURLEE, SR., JENNA FERRIS, ROBERT REARDON and others
Defendant:
OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOVELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv02485
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON LOVELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. Hernandez-Martin et al
as 6:2019cv00380
Defendant:
Luis Hernandez-Martin and David A. Lovell
Plaintiff:
JohnKevious T. Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyaart v. Travel Leaders Group, LLC et al
as 9:2018cv80257
Plaintiff:
Mabelle Meyaart
Defendant:
Travel Leaders Group, LLC , Ninan Chacko and John Lovell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Reed v. United States of America
as 8:2017cv01512
Plaintiff:
Brenton Lovell Reed
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. United States of America
as 8:2017cv01280
Plaintiff:
Lovell Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv00664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
