Cases 51 - 60 of 332
Jose Luis Martinez Mozo v. William James Marco et al
as 5:2022cv00582
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Martinez Mozo, Jessica Monserrat Mata Romero and S.L.M.M.
Defendant:
Schneider National Bulk Carriers, Inc., William James Marco and DOES 1 to 30, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Auto Negligence
Martinez v. Spaulding
as 1:2022cv00470
Petitioner:
Luis Martinez
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MARTINEZ-RAMIREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv04500
Plaintiff:
LUIS MARTINEZ-RAMIREZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MARTINEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv02365
Plaintiff:
LUIS MARTINEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martinez et al v. United States of America
as 7:2022cv00336
Lead Plaintiff:
Luis Martinez
Plaintiff:
Sharai Martinez, Valeria Martinez, Luis Jr. Martinez and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Sharp v. Martinez
as 3:2022cv00149
Petitioner:
Anthony A. Sharp
Respondent:
People of the State of California and Luis Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Eugene Rutledge v. Luis Martinez
as 21-71433
Petitioner:
EUGENE DARREL RUTLEDGE
Respondent:
LUIS MARTINEZ, Warden
Flores v. O'Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC
as 4:2021cv03951
Plaintiff:
Juan Luis Martinez Flores
Defendant:
O'Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTINEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv52736
Plaintiff:
LUIS MARTINEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
