Cases 51 - 60 of 15,385
Farr, Sr. v. Ponthler et al
as 9:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Willie Ned Farr, Sr.
Defendant:
Courtney Tracy Ponthler, Robert J. Burby, Jessie C. Dorsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Black v. Allstates Restoration, LLC
as 1:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
Michael Black
Defendant:
Allstates Restoration, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Kindred v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Herman Kindred
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID, Erik K. White, The State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thiels v. Berger et al
as 4:2024cv01668
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thiels
Defendant:
William J. Berger, Robert L. Lane, Nora Mead Brownell and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Shepherd v. Travelers Personal Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Michael Shepherd
Defendant:
Travelers Personal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Boswell v. Huntsville Parole et al
as 6:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
John A. Boswell
Defendant:
Huntsville Parole, Carmella Jones, Michael Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ybarra v. Alabama Motor Express Inc et al
as 3:2024cv01058
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL YBARRA
Defendant:
Alabama Motor Express Inc and ISAAC LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Smith v. Arc Devices LTD
as 3:2024cv01050
Plaintiff:
Michael smith
Defendant:
Arc Devices LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
