Cases 51 - 60 of 87
Holmon v. Hennessey et al
as 4:2010cv01546
Plaintiff:
Darryle D. Holmon
Defendant:
Michael Hennessey, Kruger, Sr., Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marquis v. San Francisco Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2010cv01337
Plaintiff:
Lane L. Marquis
Defendant:
San Francisco Sheriff's Department, Michael Hennessey and Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Starks v. Hennessey
as 3:2010cv00820
Petitioner:
Marion C. Starks
Respondent:
Michael Hennessey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman v. Hennessey et al
as 3:2010cv00665
Plaintiff:
Roderick Coleman
Defendant:
Michael Hennessey, Tilton, Kroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Starks v. Seaver et al
as 3:2010cv00278
Plaintiff:
Marion C. Starks
Defendant:
Seaver and Michael Hennessey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Starks v. Hennessey
as 3:2010cv00062
Petitioner:
Marion Cedric Starks
Respondent:
Michael Hennessey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Starks v. Hennessey
as 3:2009cv06073
Petitioner:
Marion Cedric Starks
Respondent:
Michael Hennessey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colley v. Recot et al
as 3:2009cv06005
Plaintiff:
Patrick Alan Colley
Defendant:
P. Recot, Miamoto, Jail Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv05331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Haskell et al v. Brown et al
as 3:2009cv04779
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Aida Haskell, Elizabeth Aida Haskell, Elizabeth Aida Haskell and others
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Eva Steinberger and Michael Hennessey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.