Cases 51 - 60 of 4,955
Murphy v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2023cv04937
Plaintiff:
Lawrence E. Murphy
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Galanto et al v. Murphy et al
as 3:2023cv03809
Plaintiff:
Susan Galanto and CCCages LLC
Defendant:
Teresa Murphy and Cagetopia LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
(PC) Murphy v. Fleming, et al.
as 1:2023cv01164
Plaintiff:
Douglas Murphy
Defendant:
Leigh Fleming, Ambrosia Fitzgerald, Attorney Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06841
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Alexis Murphy v. Entertainment Partners, LLC
as 2:2023cv06714
Plaintiff:
Alexis Murphy
Defendant:
Entertainment Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Branch v. American First Finance, LLC
as 3:2023cv04311
Petitioner:
Maengra Branch, MARTHA ALCALA, JOSE ARELLANO and others
Respondent:
American First Finance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Murphy et al v. Meta Platforms Inc.
as 3:2023cv00899
Plaintiff:
Nancy Murphy and Robert Stewart
Defendant:
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS, INC. doing business as JEFFERSON HEALTH and Meta Platforms Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
(PS) Murphy v. Antioch Police Dept.
as 2:2023cv01458
Plaintiff:
Shannon O. Murphy, Sr.
Defendant:
Antioch Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
