Cases 51 - 60 of 125
Welsh v. McLane
as 1:2020cv00792
Defendant:
Marsha McLane
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lonnie Welsh v. Correct Care, L.L.C., et al
as 20-10412
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL SEARCY and MARSHA MCLANE, TCCO Executive Director
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LONNIE KADE WELSH
Welsh v. Collier et al
as 1:2020cv00337
Defendant:
Ricki Redman, Brian Collier, FNU LNU and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuel San Miguel v. Marsha McLane, et al
as 20-10171
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL SEARCY, Op. Spec, TCCO, CHRIS SALINAS, TCCO Case Manager, TAMRA DEWBRE, Clinical Thearapist and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL SAN MIGUEL
Massingill v. Mclane - TCCO Executive Director et al
as 5:2020cv00026
Defendant:
Lisa Peralta, Management and Training Coporation, Marsha Mclane - TCCO Executive Director and others
Plaintiff:
Winfred Gentry Massingill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lonnie Welsh v. Correct Care, L.L.C., et al
as 19-11236
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL SEARCY and MARSHA MCLANE, TCCO Executive Director
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LONNIE KADE WELSH
Miguel v. Mclane - TCCO Executive Director et al
as 5:2019cv00199
Plaintiff:
Samuel San Miguel
Defendant:
David Bowers, Marsha Mclane - TCCO Executive Director, Tamra Dewbre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Mclane - TCCO Executive Director et al
as 5:2019cv00192
Defendant:
Alissa Jordan, Marsha Mclane - TCCO Executive Director, Sharrise Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Delbert Glenn Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conley v. Mclane - TCCO Executive Director
as 5:2019cv00184
Respondent:
Marsha Mclane - TCCO Executive Director
Petitioner:
Danny Bruce Conley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Mclane - TCCO Executive Director
as 5:2019cv00182
Respondent:
Marsha Mclane - TCCO Executive Director
Petitioner:
Timothy Leonard Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
