Cases 51 - 60 of 226
Lacey v. Marshall et al
as 1:2021cv00729
Plaintiff:
Terrance Adrian Lacey
Defendant:
Bill Elder and T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yakas et al v. Roark et al
as 1:2020cv03818
Defendant:
Alison Morgan, Mo, Colorado Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Pritchard and Joshua Yakas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mcknight v. Arapahoe County, Colorado et al
as 1:2020cv03678
Defendant:
Nick (I) Natali, Nick Natali, Arapahoe County, Colorado and others
Plaintiff:
Elijah McKnight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindblad v. SRI Technologies Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03330
Defendant:
SRI Technologies Inc., United States of America Government and Grand Marshalls Protective Services
Plaintiff:
Robert Lindblad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webster v. Padilla et al
as 1:2020cv03303
Defendant:
John Masso, Jill Marshall, Nancy Bensik and others
Plaintiff:
Darren Webster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoffschneider v. Marshall et al
as 1:2020cv03018
Defendant:
Lennart (I) Abel, Jill Marshall, Rebecca Hearst and others
Plaintiff:
David Hoffschneider
Snyder v. Prison Medical Department at Centennial Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2020cv02953
Plaintiff:
David Snyder
Defendant:
Prison Medical Department at Centennial Correctional Facility, Marshall Griffith, Sarah Berger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Marshall et al
as 1:2020cv02611
Defendant:
Annabelle Flores and Jill Marshall
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rath v. Marshall et al
as 1:2020cv01882
Petitioner:
Jacob Benjamin Rath
Respondent:
Jill Marshall and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wind v. United States Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv01113
Defendant:
Kate Knowles, Matthew Newcomer, James McKenzie and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Carl Wind, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
