Cases filed in Ohio
Cases 51 - 60 of 344
Marshall v. Instant Brands, Inc.
as 2:2021cv03965
Plaintiff: Deetra Marshall
Defendant: Instant Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marshall v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03702
Plaintiff: Terry Scott Marshall
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gibson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03525
Plaintiff: Marshall Gibson
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marshall et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03134
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: CLARA E. MARSHALL and JOHN L. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hunter v. United Airlines Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00940
Defendant: Airway Cleaners, United Airlines Inc., Pam Pollack and others
Plaintiff: Marshall Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marshall v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01860
Defendant: Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Plaintiff: Joseph Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lenhart v. Savetski et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00611
Defendant: Kimberly Cummings, Nathan Savetski, Adult Parole Authority and others
Plaintiff: Christopher Lenhart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cervantes, et al v. Phillips, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00246
Plaintiff: Julian Aragon Cervantes, Nathan Parker and Silvestre Martinez
Defendant: Warden Michael Phillips, Core Civic and the Individual Contractors and U.S. Marshals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00364
Defendant: Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff: Janice Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lathan et al v. Rutter et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00042
Plaintiff: Darek Lathan, Kelley Lee, Richard Stewart and others
Defendant: John Tharp, Alex Rutter, Dennis Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?