Cases 51 - 60 of 232
Kenneth Kelley v. William Bohrer
as 23-6179
Petitioner:
KENNETH KELLEY
Respondent:
WILLIAM S. BOHRER, Acting Warden and MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL
Nealy v. Warden of MCTC et al
as 1:2023cv00467
Petitioner:
Michael Nealy
Respondent:
Warden of MCTC and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ronald Cox v. Ronald Weber
as 23-6044
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD COX
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN ALLEN GANG, MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL, WARDEN RONALD S. WEBER and others
Peter Gakuba v. Maryland Attorney General's Office
as 23-6012
Petitioner / Appellant:
PETER GAKUBA
Respondent / Appellee:
MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Raaj Rafa El v. Frederick Abelto
as 22-7408
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAAJ RAFA EL, a/k/a Roger Moore, a/k/a Raaj Rafael
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN FREDERICK T. ABELTO and MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL
Chapman v. Nines et al
as 1:2022cv03136
Plaintiff:
Jamal Chapman
Defendant:
Jeff Nines and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Darden et al
as 1:2022cv03149
Petitioner:
Adrian Francis Lewis
Respondent:
Warden Debora Darden and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson, Jr. v. Werner et al
as 1:2022cv03118
Petitioner:
Dyron Jackson, Jr.
Respondent:
Maryland Attorney General, Gregory A. Werner and Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benson v. Warden et al
as 1:2022cv02953
Petitioner:
Jerrod Lamont Benson
Respondent:
Warden and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wardrick v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2022cv02952
Petitioner:
Robert Wardrick
Respondent:
State of Maryland and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
