Cases 51 - 60 of 72
Harris v. Straughn et al
as 5:2011cv00124
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Harris
Defendant:
Clayton Straughn and John McCraw, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook et al v. A.W. Chesterton et al
as 3:2011cv00128
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Cook and Annette Cook
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton, Able Supply Company , Allis-Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Solis v. WIN Association LLC, et al
as 4:2011cv00616
Defendant:
WIN Association LLC, The WIN Association Health Plan and Michael Ray Bianchi
Plaintiff:
Hilda L Solis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
Martin v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2010cv00538
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Martin
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Martin v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2010cv00071
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Martin
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Thaler
as 4:2010cv00141
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Jackson
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McMahan v. Owens
as 1:2009cv00741
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray McMahan
Defendant:
Rissie Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Yamaha Motor Corporation, USA et al
as 6:2009cv00143
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Williams and Michael Ray Williams
Defendant:
Yamaha Motor Corporation, USA, Yamaha Motor Manufacturing Corporation of America and Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Vanetta v. Quarterman
as 3:2009cv01009
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Vanetta
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
