Cases 51 - 60 of 93
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
O'Neill v. Correctional Health Care Company, et al
as 1:2014cv02114
Plaintiff:
Neal O'Neill
Defendant:
Howard, Nuncio, Muzzy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv01855
Plaintiff:
Loyd W. Neal
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Goyal et al
as 1:2014mc00102
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Neal V. Goyal, Caldera Advisors, LLC, Blue Horizon Asset Management, LLC and others
Neal v. USA
as 1:2014cv01071
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Sir Alexander Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ippolito v. Justice Service Division et al
as 1:2013cv03480
Plaintiff:
Joseph C. Ippolito
Defendant:
Justice Service Division, Kurt Pierpont, Kurt (I) Pierpont and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Garcia
as 1:2013cv03441
Petitioner:
David Neal
Respondent:
Rene Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Case name not on file
as 1:2013cv02626
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
DDR Corp
Thirdparty_defendant:
Control Building Services, Inc., Control Equity Group, Edward Turen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Brown Brothers Asphalt & Concrete, Inc. v. DDR MCH East LLC et al.
as 1:2013cv02630
Defendant:
DDR Corp and DDR MCH East LLC
Thirdparty_defendant:
Control Building Services Inc. , Control Equity Group, Inc. , Edward Turen and others
Plaintiff:
Brown Brothers Asphalt & Concrete, Inc.
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
DDR Corp and DDR MCH East LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Denison v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv01584
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Nechol Denison
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Correctional Health Partners, Jill Lampela and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
